encounters at the rim of the sky

In the last month or so, I’ve probably spend a full work week playing The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. For those of you who don’t play games, Skyrim is a fantasy genre based RPG (role-playing game). I’m not much of a gamer, but last year I got addicted to Fallout 3 and Fallout New Vegas and once I made the connection that Bethesda Studios was the developer of both games, I made sure I got a copy of the game.

Another thing that I’ve been occupied with during this last month is thinking deeply about what kind of person I would like to be, what kind of habits and disciplines I want to cultivate, those kind of questions that frequently preoccupy people in my stage of life. In the last few months I decided to confront head on some ongoing problems that I’ve been having with clinical depression and underlying emotional issues.

Where these two things come together is in the strange way that RPGs both allow us some escape from the limitations of our real lives, as well as express some immutable aspects of our own personalities.

One great project that looks at this aspect of games and virtual identity is photographer Robbie Cooper’s Alter Egos. The aspirational aspect of avatars is less pronounced in many of his portraits than those above and below, and you can really see a spectrum from those that model their virtual representations closely after themselves to those that model their avatars on what they most want to be.

And so I thought I’d take a look at my Skyrim character and consider what it might reveal about myself. My character (minus armor and other accouterments) looks more or less like the figure on the left:

The most notable characteristic about my character is that he’s an Argonian (or, as I describe him to other people, “one of the weird lizard guys”). In the world of Skyrim, Argonians are one of the “othered” groups that is furthest away from the Nords. I think the reason that I tend to pick characters that are far outside the normative image of the blond, male hero (my Fallout: New Vegas character was a mixed-race elderly woman) has a root both in my discomfort with that image (and the insecurities that I have about being compared to that standard) as well as some kind of desire to reduce the ambiguity of the privileges that I carry around with me. Both as a sexual minority and as a mixed race person, I will never be able to inhabit that norm, but I feel like I have to take responsibility for the fact that many of the signs that signal to others that I am apart from them–language and vocabulary, skin color, name–are hidden. On some level–and I appreciate how solipsistic this–I envy the lizard man, who will never be able to pass for anything but himself; anyone that accepts him accepting him on his own terms.

My character is a heavily magic reliant character, and I know this is an expression of both the pride that I take in my own intelligence and education, and the desire that raw intelligence would translate into an easier way of life. Magic, as intelligence, is an alternate measure of power independent of physical strength. I’ve relied–to different degrees at different times–all my life on that coping mechanism, that even though other people might be stronger, or scrappier, or faster, or better looking, I’m more intelligent. It’s a thought that has the potential to become poisonous, and it always comes with a corresponding doubt, or insecurity. James Agee expresses this thought well in his novel, A Death in the Family. Six year-old Rufus has stopped with his father at a bar after a movie, and his father is bragging to all of the patrons about how well his boy can read:

Rufus felt a sudden hollowness in his voice, and all along the bar, and in his own heart. But how does he fight, he thought. You don’t brag about smartness if your son is brave. He felt the anguish of shame, but his father did not seem to notice…

Intelligence, of course, does bring about great power and an easier life. But that’s intelligence paired with luck and hard work, and the power and leisure are indirect. By playing a magical character, I’m able to envision a world in which raw intelligence and talent can directly translate into power and wealth. It lets me defeat my enemies without defeating my own demons.

There are countless other things that I read into my character as expressions of myself, again either as myself or as my opposite. My character tends to just rush into situations, taking on dungeons far above my level just for the challenge, instead of the timidness and fearfulness that I see in myself. Like my character, I’m a sentimentalist, and tend to keep random junk well past my sell-by date. But I like to think that by letting my ego run wild in the game, I can open doors to myself that I couldn’t in life. Or at least that’s how I’m justifying the 40+ hours I’ve sunk into the game: therapy.

remains of the day(s)

1.4.2011. The spirit lives at the Spirit of ‘77. It’s unclear whether it is 1877 or 1977. MLK Boulevard, Portland, Oregon.

1.5.2011 No photo. This is what I get for letting my friend use their camera. “I’ll send it to you when I get back!” 

  • A very sweet article from the NYT about independence, adulthood and dating in the autism world. Introduced me to the term “mindblind.”
  • An amazing piece of arts journalism from the San Francisco Classical Voice from Mark MacNamara about the San Francisco Girls Chorus. I might have more to say on this later, but it really highlights the difference between finding a musical director for a professional institution and something like a children’s chorus.
  • Did you like yesterday’s piece on Nina Simone? A resource I found helpful was this Nina Simone database/discography lovingly put together by a fan. As digital collections, box sets, and low-budget reissues become more common, these kind of resources will become even more valuable.
  • Putting in a little plug for my Tumblr, for those of you that are into that sort of thing.

i think its going to rain today

I’ve been listening obsessively for the last 24 hours to Nina Simone & Piano! prompting some scattered thoughts:

Nina Simone is my kind of diva. It’s obligatory for gays to pick one, and I think it becomes a kind of generational identifier: the generation of Judy Garland, the generation of Madonna, the new generation of Gaga. There’s another kind of diva too, your Arethas, your Whitneys. Nina Simone doesn’t fit comfortably in either box. She was genderqueer before that was a thing, and certainly had a voice as strong as anyone, but Nina Simone was first, always, about the music*.

*Yeah, I said it. She’s all about the music, man. I’m starting off 2012 post-irony. Which may or may not be sincerity.

Generations of listeners have connected with her because of the uniqueness and strength of her voice, but I think one of the most essential components of Nina’s sound is that I never get the sense that she is particularly concerned with sounding pretty. Nina’s one of those amazing singers with a singing voice that sounds effortless, like an extension of her speaking voice. It means that you never have a hard time understanding the words of the song, and allows her to become a character, or a narrator. The speechlike quality of her voice also gives her songs an incredible emotional charge. In sad songs, it becomes blunt, almost detached, the directness cutting way deeper than any affectation. In happy songs, or love songs, it’s so plan and declamatory that it transcends emotion and becomes truth.

I think the reason that Nina goes straight to my heart, though, is because as wonderful as her singing is, her piano chops may even be better. A lot of the original soul sistuhs don’t get the credit they deserve for their instrumental chops. For example, check out Aretha shredding “Bridge Over Troubled Water” here:

But in Nina, a confidence born from prodigious talent and an instinctual comfort at the piano created a radical, and radically beautiful, mixture of classical technique and improvisation, gospel flourishes, and jazz chord voicing. Just check out her rendition of Leonard Bernstein’s “Who Am I?:”

The first 20 seconds of that song would be at home in any Russian 20th century piano piece. And her deconstruction of the song elevates it from show tune to high art.

The song that slays me on the album, however, is her incredible version of one of my favorite songs, period: Randy Newman’s “I Think It’s Going to Rain Today.”

“I Think It’s Going to Rain Today” presents a few interpretive challenges for a singer. The most difficult is getting the emotional tone of the song right. It’s a song about isolation, and it’s a deeply ironic song. Social isolation is usually sad (Scarecrows dressed in the latest styles/Their frozen smiles to chase love away) and irony about being sad usually becomes triple or quadruple sad. And yet the song is actually pretty ambiguous about how sad it wants to be; I believe the line “Human kindness is overflowing, and I think it’s going to rain today.” The song walks the line between touchy-feely connotations of rain and water as healing and nurturing and, uh… you know, Eeyore. The most ambiguous lines of the song are the middle bridge, “Tin can at my feet/I guess I’ll kick it down the street/That’s no way to treat a friend.” In the original Newman version of the song, the music kind of breaks down; the words come out like Newman is making it up on the spot and the tight connection between the piano chords and the melody is broken. It’s actually pretty hilarious to hear the butchers who belt out the song like a showtune ballad (dealing with the irony by ignoring it completely) completely flail around in this section, searching for a chord progression to latch onto like a safety blanket.

Nina’s version isn’t simply amazing because of the incredible power of that first verse in her direct and seemingly plain style. It’s amazing because she took a song by a piano master and improved it, making it a duet between her voice and her fingers, turning it into an incredibly cinematic piece of music. It opens in her signature improvised, quasi-Classical style. Then the piano retreats a little bit, leaving room for the words and not encroaching on the emotional space. There’s a little hollow, fake cheery noodle to introduce the bridge, and then retreats completely, leaving Nina to deliver the saddest lines alone…

…until the piano comes back in, catching her at the loneliest movement, breaking into cathartic arpeggios of raindrops and rainbows and pots of gold and dancing in the streets and singing in the rain forever and ever amen.

What I love so much about her take on the song is that she plays the line “I think it’s going to rain today” perfectly both ways. In the first verse, it’s delivered with foreboding, just another fucking thing on another fucking day, the shitty Maraschino cherry on a gloomy sundae. That same line, the second time around, is a line of catharsis (she even breaks out into a joyous, “Yeah”), the rain promising to wash away all of that awfulness, the sky, just like human kindness, overflowing.

remains of the day for 3 jan 2012

  • Unintended consequences? DEA quotas mean that there are nationwide shortages of ADD & ADHD medication. Oh, and it’s also allowing the drug companies to create artificial scarcities to force patients to switch from generics to the more expensive branded versions of the same drug.
  • Are you a music person? Do you want to try and teach your friends basic music theory? Then I have a tabletop card game for you!
  • Great New Yorker profile of Sleater-Kinney/Portlandia star Carrie Brownstien. It’s a pretty nice article, and very Portland. It’s the kind of article that will probably make me nostalgic in about ten years, once I forget how awful.. uh… now is.
  • Speaking of the New Yorker, here’s a highbrow article wondering if the magazine is highbrow or lowbrow. I know I went through a few phases, including thinking it was what rich, smart people read, to hating the magazine for its stupid captions and bland design, to becoming addicted to their profiles and reportage.
  • Being fat sucks.
  • Yayoi Kusama’s The Obliteration Room:



: